|
|
Post by mick75 on Jan 23, 2008 10:30:15 GMT
i need a new rucksack my one has seen better days any ideas on a good but fair priced one needs to be quite big.thanks Mick
|
|
|
|
Post by greysfanboy on Jan 23, 2008 11:12:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mick75 on Jan 23, 2008 11:16:26 GMT
looks like the salt is worth a go and its cheep  |
|
|
|
Post by chopper on Jan 23, 2008 11:43:31 GMT
Titan matchmans rucksack is excellent value and well made. Discounts available on their website.
|
|
|
|
Post by cuckoo on Jan 23, 2008 11:56:59 GMT
mick , glasgow angling have a deal on at the moment on the mustad range through sea angler . ruck sack , rod holdall , bait bag , rig wallet and spool tube ....all for only £29.99 .... bargain id say !
lee.
|
|
|
|
Post by mick75 on Jan 23, 2008 13:31:41 GMT
Mick , glasgow angling have a deal on at the moment on the mustad range through sea angler . ruck sack , rod holdall , bait bag , rig wallet and spool tube ....all for only £29.99 .... bargain id say ! lee. looks a good deal lee but solehunters review on them put me off |
|
|
|
Post by skatenchips on Jan 23, 2008 13:58:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by daznewland1 on Jan 23, 2008 14:04:14 GMT
Titan matchmans rucksack is excellent value and well made. Discounts available on their website. il second that ;D |
|
|
|
Post by cuckoo on Jan 23, 2008 14:26:08 GMT
ive just ordered 1 of theses ;D |
|
|
|
Post by mick75 on Jan 23, 2008 14:28:48 GMT
they do look nice and big and i like loads of pockets to i think i need to sweet talk her indoors  |
|
|
|
Post by colbythecodking on Jan 23, 2008 19:32:25 GMT
hi mick! i have the salt rucksack its brill very nice big fit lots of tackle in brillllliant!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by solehunter on Jan 23, 2008 21:51:05 GMT
Yeah right! What a shower of **** they really are. I now have the salt after many reccomendations. Chuffed to bits with it. Loads of compartments ect....nice and strong material. Goob done! |
|
|
|
Post by lighty on Jan 26, 2008 12:07:25 GMT
I have used the Salt one for the last year, great bag, well built and will take as much as you want to carry in it:
But its a rucksack and rucksacks are meant to be carried on your back so Shakespeare where's the bloody padding!!! believe me its no fun wearing it with a 2 litre flask jambed against your back, or anything else in there for that matter most uncomfortable.
I know it is quite a cheap bag (£20-ish) and to have padded the back panels would have cost more but it would have made it so much more comfortable to use for long hikes.
I do like this bag but because of the above my next bag will be the imax 35, a mate has one and he has not had a problem with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by solehunter on Jan 26, 2008 21:25:42 GMT
I know what you mean about stuff digging into your back! I solve this by putting my tackle tray on end against the bit that rests on your back, nice and flat! No more reel handle massages for me!
|
|
|
|
Post by lighty on Jan 26, 2008 23:57:17 GMT
I know its overcomeable m8, my poncho softens it, but they should have incorporated padding into it.
Remember some idiot at Shakespeare design this large bag, perhaps they should ask some one at Osprey how to make a Rucksack.
|
|
